Empirical Illustration of Issues in Valuing Reliability Benefits of Transport Projects



Empirical Illustration of Issues in Valuing Reliability Benefits of Transport Projects

Nominated for The Neil Mansfield Award

Authors

Charlotte COUPE, French Ministry of Environment, Energy and the Sea, Hélène LE MAITRE, French Ministry of Environment, Energy and the Sea

Description

This paper aims at comparing methods to measure and value travel time reliability benefits of transport projects, including travel time reliability forecasting methods with an application on dedicated bus lane projects.

Abstract

The improvement of travel time reliability is valuable to travellers, since it helps them to better organise their activities or synchronize their schedules with other peoples’. Reliability benefits can be in the same order of magnitude as the travel time savings. Since 2014, reliability benefits have been included as non-mandatory in French appraisal guidelines. But although several valuation methods for reliability are available, various applicability and consistency issues remain and a comprehensive, consistent among modes and simple feasible method is needed. Thus the aim of this paper is to provide a comparison of methods with a practical perspective for a short term implementation, illustrated by an application on dedicated bus lane projects. This comparison will be derived from existing valuation methods and values from international literature, and will consider both the valuation method and the travel time reliability forecasting method in order to provide a comprehensive method.
This paper analyses the empirical robustness and consistency of the reliability benefits resulting from various methods for several modifications of the travel time distributions with a practical perspective. Two categories of methods for the valuation of travel time reliability are tested on simplified case studies of dedicated bus lane projects: mean-dispersion methods and mean-lateness methods. Regarding the mean-dispersion models, several alternatives of the dispersion indicator are tested including the standard deviation and the difference between the 90th percentile and the median of travel times. Several alternatives are also tested for mean-lateness models, since these models may or may not include the early arrivals and can be specified with various indicators for lateness and advances. The definition of lateness and advance may also vary (valuation of the mean of the travel time between scheduled arrival and actual arrival or valuation of the variation in percentage of late buses for instance). Then the forecast of reliability indicators for such projects is discussed. Statistical models are tested to estimate 90th percentile and finally some tests are run to analyse the sensitivity of reliability benefits to the perimeter over which they are calculated (link or itinerary).

Publisher

Association for European Transport